Overall, the special feature of our dilemma is the collapse of Protestantism, which has left our warriors without a unifying principle. For 300 years until the 1960's, the Protestant work ethic was the pounding heart of European confidence. And it has gone! Leaving our alpha males discombobulated. The centre has collapsed. And into the vacuum are being drawn all manner of illicit elements: notably the corporate media.
My dream is that a homemaker allowance will substantially fill that void left by the collapse of Protestantism: the breadwinner and homemaker marriage being the central fact of worthwhile existence.
Purposeful thought is the responsibility of a society's warriors. To an extent, a society IS what its warrior males will kill and die for. And a society lacking a confident warrior class gets taken over and trashed for the fun of it. WE~the modern, middle-class, christoid West~are being trashed because we allow ourselves to be trashed. WE create the trashing process, not the elements that trash us: Feminists, media, corporations and minority types. They have no real existence: They are only what they can get away with being.
It does not matter who is taking us for a ride: how or why the media are taking us for a ride. The answer is always, We let them! We are the problem, not the runts who trash us. The tendency to put the boot in is universal. That's the runt in all of us.
(Incidentally, there is a bible commandment here. 'Thou shalt not seethe the kid in its mother's milk': a metaphor, You must not add insult to injury. You must not succumb to that temptation to take advantage of people who are in a position to be taken advantage of.)
You may object I am only addressing the symptoms of a rotten society: that getting rid of working couples, and bringing back breadwinner and homemaker couples, will not cure our malaise. But you may have the symptoms of flu~the stuffed up nose and itchy cough~without the flu. You still have to relieve the symptoms.
Similarly a pampered government class is always a symptom of a rotten society. Ottomans, Hapsburgs, Romanovs: They all coddled their government workers. Like the emperor system in old China floating on a cloud of eunuchs. Trudeau humiliated every honest man and woman in Canada with his indulgence towards the Post Office workers. Wasn't that his intention?
Similarly in South Africa under apartheit: The Boers all got jobs as bus drivers and municipal employees. If apartheit had been honest, those servant-class jobs would have gone to the blacks. Apartheid was always a scam. That was how the honest Boers lost control of their country.
I can't go into the details of a homemaker allowance: the tax angles and child benefits. That's not my forte. Just get the wagon train rolling, and fix the wheels as they fall off. Like unemployment insurance, the allowance will never be finalised. My contribution is to locate the idea at the heart of honest, 'middle-class' civilisation.
P.S. 'Anonymous': I also misspelled Pickton; but thanks for the thought.
Friday, November 30, 2007
Sunday, November 18, 2007
intermezzo
When I say Feminists are being exploited as black labour to break the men~Which is the nicest thing you will read about Feminism in this blog~please remember: For the last thirty years, I have been polite and got nowhere. I can't mince words anymore. It's only their gender that stops them from being told what they are. Feminists are scabs! Happy now?
On planet Reality, if you go from a system where it takes a man's wages to support a family, to a system where it takes a husband and wife both working full-time to maintain the same family, the standard of living has been cut in half. On planet MediaSymbol, it is called Women's Equality! On planet Reality, it is called peonage.
The introduction of women into the workforce did not raise the standard of living but cut the value of wages. When women's incomes were added to men's for mortgage purposes, the price of housing went through the roof. And it now takes two incomes to realise the same standard of living one could achieve before. Where once a house represented 8 years of one man's savings, now it represents 30 years of two people's savings. The same house costs 7 times as much! when private home ownership is a staple of middle-class life, like bread almost.
Until the Feminist makeover, wages and prices were based on men as breadwinners and women as homemakers in single-income households. Men had a right to high wages, not as men, but as breadwinners with wives and families to support. And it is a try-on for Feminists to demand parity for women as singles and second-wage earners.
Feminism is such a blatant con, it is terrifying to think how they got away with it. Western society has to have failed at every point, and every organised element in it. But that's for another blog. For the nonce, the way out of the mess is a homemaker allowance. We don't want the media leading us by the symbols. We want reality!
On planet Reality, if you go from a system where it takes a man's wages to support a family, to a system where it takes a husband and wife both working full-time to maintain the same family, the standard of living has been cut in half. On planet MediaSymbol, it is called Women's Equality! On planet Reality, it is called peonage.
The introduction of women into the workforce did not raise the standard of living but cut the value of wages. When women's incomes were added to men's for mortgage purposes, the price of housing went through the roof. And it now takes two incomes to realise the same standard of living one could achieve before. Where once a house represented 8 years of one man's savings, now it represents 30 years of two people's savings. The same house costs 7 times as much! when private home ownership is a staple of middle-class life, like bread almost.
Until the Feminist makeover, wages and prices were based on men as breadwinners and women as homemakers in single-income households. Men had a right to high wages, not as men, but as breadwinners with wives and families to support. And it is a try-on for Feminists to demand parity for women as singles and second-wage earners.
Feminism is such a blatant con, it is terrifying to think how they got away with it. Western society has to have failed at every point, and every organised element in it. But that's for another blog. For the nonce, the way out of the mess is a homemaker allowance. We don't want the media leading us by the symbols. We want reality!
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
Anti-Feminist Psycho-Babble
1. Employment masculinises. A boy with a well-paid job gets a car, a girl, a house and a family. When you masculinise a boy, you get a man. When you masculinise a girl, you get a female eunuch. Frontline employment simplifies matters for boys but complicates them for girls. Young single men were always allowed a grace period as potential breadwinners: fast-tracked to maturity: allowed the high-paying jobs that properly belong to breadwinner males. Whereas young single women allowed high-paying jobs are fast-tracked to old maids: effectively sterilised.
A homemaker allowance won't finally resolve this or any other problem, but it should contain it. Recognition of the breadwinner and homemaker entity implies priority for breadwinners in the workplace, with homemakers taking part-time jobs. Quite how singles will be affected is obscure.
Single men in management and the professions were always expected to do voluntary work as a condition of employ-ment. That could be a rule. Young women dislike that extra workload. These things were always done unofficially.
2. Castration complex. Life consists in an urge to grow into full, upright, responsible adults; as opposed by an anti-life urge to shrivel back into stunted no-lives: what Freud called the castration complex. A most confusing name! It is essentially infantile in nature: confined to Number One. An infant has no awareness of anything not tending to it. As it grows up, it becomes aware of other existence. But what happens if it doesn't grow up? It denies the existence of things in their own right. Everything is what the infant thinks it is. It denies the essential difference between men and women, and between sex and masturbation. And the male orgasm of course.
3. Anal types believe in symbols. A twink will take his girl friend to a gay bar: He still believes in heterosexuality. He will have sex with his boyfriend while his girlfriend watches: He still believes in the symbol. He sees a young mother going to work with her kids in daycare, and thinks it's women's equality. He thinks a pokey one bedroom apartment is superior to a spacious studio, and pays as much for it! The market price for a 450 square foot one bedroom apartment is the same as for a 1000 square foot studio. Guess which the market provides! The corporations love them. Twinks rule!.
4. Twinks like women. In passing I have to say: It is not a sign of healthy sexual development for a man to like women, if anything, the opposite. A really straight man feels degraded if his wife has to work. He wants to protect and provide for his woman. Whereas a pimp puts his woman out to work. Government workers arranged jobs for their wives when women achieved 'equality', marginalising the alpha males.
Once you go down that line~that men like women~you end up ruled by the silliest twink on the block: who most defers to women, who takes the most garbage from women. He is the most heterosexual! We need an alternative concept of the relationship between men and women, based not on feelings but a division of labour. Which is not to say you can't have feelings as well.
The only people who are happy in a non-sexual male/female environment are twinks and their pre-sexual girl-friends. Everyone else wants men and women in reciprocal roles. We are re-structuring the workplace for the benefit of an immature phase, making maturity a liability.
5. Female eunuchs. 1-2% of live-births are sexually unfinished either as males or as females. They have a kind of ingrowing penis (Spare us the details!) and are usually classed as females. So some 3% of apparant women are more like 'female eunuchs' as they have been called. They cannot make it either as men or as women in a world of men and women. So whereas sane people want the male/female thing to work~Which is how I see the breadwinner and homemaker marriage: the essence of the male/female relationship~female eunuchs don't want men and women to succeed.
Any hint of gender denial is close to insanity. If a man dresses as a girl at Halloween, that's fun. But if he takes it seriously, he is whacko. Once you deny the complementary natures of male and female, each incomplete in itself, joined in a mutually beneficial supportive/dependant relationship, there is no end to the lunacy.
6. Our Anal Media. Simplest explanations are best. A mental age of sixteen is needed to appreciate the breadwinner and homemaker marriage; and the media have a mental age of six. Somehow the media are stuck in the 'anal' stage: Everything is Number One. And a breadwinner and homemaker are not two Number Ones. They do not seek completion individually but in a union. And that is outside the media 'box': The anal mind cannot fathom that concept.
To the infant brain, a breadwinner is one thing, and a homemaker another: like a librarian and a lion tamer. And the people most afflicted are those with the highest IQ's. Educated women's brains come to a halt when they think of an argument. Finished! The argument is the conclusion.
If there is a particle of validity to the concept of a breadwinner and homemaker marriage, then the entire Feminist proposition, as it has been touted by the media this last forty years, is a scam.
A homemaker allowance won't finally resolve this or any other problem, but it should contain it. Recognition of the breadwinner and homemaker entity implies priority for breadwinners in the workplace, with homemakers taking part-time jobs. Quite how singles will be affected is obscure.
Single men in management and the professions were always expected to do voluntary work as a condition of employ-ment. That could be a rule. Young women dislike that extra workload. These things were always done unofficially.
2. Castration complex. Life consists in an urge to grow into full, upright, responsible adults; as opposed by an anti-life urge to shrivel back into stunted no-lives: what Freud called the castration complex. A most confusing name! It is essentially infantile in nature: confined to Number One. An infant has no awareness of anything not tending to it. As it grows up, it becomes aware of other existence. But what happens if it doesn't grow up? It denies the existence of things in their own right. Everything is what the infant thinks it is. It denies the essential difference between men and women, and between sex and masturbation. And the male orgasm of course.
3. Anal types believe in symbols. A twink will take his girl friend to a gay bar: He still believes in heterosexuality. He will have sex with his boyfriend while his girlfriend watches: He still believes in the symbol. He sees a young mother going to work with her kids in daycare, and thinks it's women's equality. He thinks a pokey one bedroom apartment is superior to a spacious studio, and pays as much for it! The market price for a 450 square foot one bedroom apartment is the same as for a 1000 square foot studio. Guess which the market provides! The corporations love them. Twinks rule!.
4. Twinks like women. In passing I have to say: It is not a sign of healthy sexual development for a man to like women, if anything, the opposite. A really straight man feels degraded if his wife has to work. He wants to protect and provide for his woman. Whereas a pimp puts his woman out to work. Government workers arranged jobs for their wives when women achieved 'equality', marginalising the alpha males.
Once you go down that line~that men like women~you end up ruled by the silliest twink on the block: who most defers to women, who takes the most garbage from women. He is the most heterosexual! We need an alternative concept of the relationship between men and women, based not on feelings but a division of labour. Which is not to say you can't have feelings as well.
The only people who are happy in a non-sexual male/female environment are twinks and their pre-sexual girl-friends. Everyone else wants men and women in reciprocal roles. We are re-structuring the workplace for the benefit of an immature phase, making maturity a liability.
5. Female eunuchs. 1-2% of live-births are sexually unfinished either as males or as females. They have a kind of ingrowing penis (Spare us the details!) and are usually classed as females. So some 3% of apparant women are more like 'female eunuchs' as they have been called. They cannot make it either as men or as women in a world of men and women. So whereas sane people want the male/female thing to work~Which is how I see the breadwinner and homemaker marriage: the essence of the male/female relationship~female eunuchs don't want men and women to succeed.
Any hint of gender denial is close to insanity. If a man dresses as a girl at Halloween, that's fun. But if he takes it seriously, he is whacko. Once you deny the complementary natures of male and female, each incomplete in itself, joined in a mutually beneficial supportive/dependant relationship, there is no end to the lunacy.
6. Our Anal Media. Simplest explanations are best. A mental age of sixteen is needed to appreciate the breadwinner and homemaker marriage; and the media have a mental age of six. Somehow the media are stuck in the 'anal' stage: Everything is Number One. And a breadwinner and homemaker are not two Number Ones. They do not seek completion individually but in a union. And that is outside the media 'box': The anal mind cannot fathom that concept.
To the infant brain, a breadwinner is one thing, and a homemaker another: like a librarian and a lion tamer. And the people most afflicted are those with the highest IQ's. Educated women's brains come to a halt when they think of an argument. Finished! The argument is the conclusion.
If there is a particle of validity to the concept of a breadwinner and homemaker marriage, then the entire Feminist proposition, as it has been touted by the media this last forty years, is a scam.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)