When I say Feminists are being exploited as black labour to break the men~Which is the nicest thing you will read about Feminism in this blog~please remember: For the last thirty years, I have been polite and got nowhere. I can't mince words anymore. It's only their gender that stops them from being told what they are. Feminists are scabs! Happy now?
On planet Reality, if you go from a system where it takes a man's wages to support a family, to a system where it takes a husband and wife both working full-time to maintain the same family, the standard of living has been cut in half. On planet MediaSymbol, it is called Women's Equality! On planet Reality, it is called peonage.
The introduction of women into the workforce did not raise the standard of living but cut the value of wages. When women's incomes were added to men's for mortgage purposes, the price of housing went through the roof. And it now takes two incomes to realise the same standard of living one could achieve before. Where once a house represented 8 years of one man's savings, now it represents 30 years of two people's savings. The same house costs 7 times as much! when private home ownership is a staple of middle-class life, like bread almost.
Until the Feminist makeover, wages and prices were based on men as breadwinners and women as homemakers in single-income households. Men had a right to high wages, not as men, but as breadwinners with wives and families to support. And it is a try-on for Feminists to demand parity for women as singles and second-wage earners.
Feminism is such a blatant con, it is terrifying to think how they got away with it. Western society has to have failed at every point, and every organised element in it. But that's for another blog. For the nonce, the way out of the mess is a homemaker allowance. We don't want the media leading us by the symbols. We want reality!
Who is 'chopped-liver'? A housewife or a working wife? Who is to be preferred? One-income or two-income marriages? This last forty years, we have promoted working couples while leaving single-income marriages to fend for themselves. It should be the other way around. Single-income marriages deserve support. I propose to replace child allowances with a HOMEMAKER ALLOWANCE. The strengthening of the family. And the restoration of middle-class society.
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Great Uncle Clive
- The same age, height, weight and initials as Cassius Clay, your favourite great uncle was born a Capricorn in the Year of the Snake. (Am I ever wise!) He has a good honours degree from an ancient British university. If you believe in symbols, kneel! In reality he has a lower second BA in geography from Durham. You may rise! (I don't make the rules!) He dropped out in the late Sixties to write up an insight (because I couldn't take to any work routine) and spent his entire life on the project. It was quite unpublishable. It used the idea of a Dual Brain to hold together the conflict between symbol and reality, right and good. Pounded by the hammers of rejection, we came to conclude the best hope for mankind lay in a homemaker allowance. So blog it!
1 comment:
Not bad article, but I really miss that you didn't express your opinion, but ok you just have different approach
Post a Comment