The Feminist Revolution

Any attempt at separating the sheep from the goats is resisted by the goats. I want a homemaker allowance to validate middle class society. The media disallow any mention of the concept. I want an honest, smooth-running society: The goats want a free ride. And the sheep want to bleat.

The Feminist revolution defines the terms of our existence: Winners and Losers

a) Feminism was good for property values: Working couples pushed up the price of housing
b) Feminism undermined union power: Fighting men cannot fight women
c) Feminism was good for government workers: They could double up
d) Feminism was good for pensioners: They could get double pensions
e) Feminism was good for management: a heirarchy of mixed humans needs more management than a team of men
f) Feminism empowered groupies and no-lives, and immobilised couples with children

The big winners were management and rich property owners. Pensioners and govt workers were bought off. Ordinary middle class homeowners marked time. Anyone not in the property market, and future generations, lost heavily. But the really big losers were couples wanting good homes for their children.


WOMEN'S EQUALITY AND RACIAL EQUALITY


Let's say Feminism is 90% scam and 10% feeble-mindedness. (Hey, It's Christmas, OK!) A retard could honestly confuse women's equality with racial equality.

The key difference is that races are whole populations while men and women women are parts of a population.

black people = white people
black men = white men
black women = white women
black children = white children

It is loonie tunes to suggest black women should have parity with white children; or black men with black children; or white women with white men.

Who are valuable govt jobs to go to? This is the bottom line. Racially disadvantaged men or privileged women? Racist white men would rather govt jobs go to privileged white women than to disadvantaged black men. When Feminists demand more firefighters should be women, I say again, they are performing the base role of scab for the most nauseating element imaginable. (Keep calm uncle! It's Christmas!)

A black man with a wife and kids to support has to be able to bump a single white girl out of a govt job. That's self-evident. Carry on from there.

The solution has something to do with the ideal of completion: people realised to the fullest possible extent: individually and collectively. Equally fully-realised, racial groups would have similar occupational/wealth structures. Fully-realised, men and women would have different structures: Most women would be homemakers with part-time jobs, and most men would be breadwinners with full-time jobs. That is the main sense in which women are the equals of men. It just needs a little fine-tuning.

Female labour is still as generally socially-undesirable as child labour. Because a child or a woman can do a job is no reason for them to do it. They may be hurt by it. Let's focus on getting ourselves out of the hole, instead of digging ourselves deeper into it. We want a homemaker allowance. To be continued.